On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 11:36:35AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > I think the better way to do this is allowing strncpy_from_user() O > if some conditions are match, like > > - strncpy_from_user() will be able to copy user memory with set_fs(USER_DS) > - strncpy_from_user() can copy kernel memory with set_fs(KERNEL_DS) > - strncpy_from_user() can access unsafe memory in IRQ context if > pagefault is disabled. > > This is almost done, except for CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP=y on x86. > > So, what about adding a condition to WARN_ON_IN_IRQ() like below > instead of introducing user_access_ok() ? > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h > index 780f2b42c8ef..ec0f0b74c9ab 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h > @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static inline bool __chk_range_not_ok(unsigned long addr, > unsigned long size, un > }) > > #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP > -# define WARN_ON_IN_IRQ() WARN_ON_ONCE(!in_task()) > +# define WARN_ON_IN_IRQ() WARN_ON_ONCE(pagefault_disabled() && > !in_task())
That doesn't make any kind of sense to me; see faulthandler_disabled(). IOW. interrupt (and any atomic context really) won't take faults anyway. I dislike that whole KERNEL_DS thing, but obviously that's not something that's going away. Would something like: WARN_ON_ONCE(!(in_task || segment_eq(get_fs(), USER_DS))) Work? Then we allow KERNEL_DS in task context, but for interrupt and others require USER_DS.