On 2019-03-19 3:05 p.m., Mike Rapoport wrote:
>> You're probably referring to [1] which was for arm64 and was redundant
>> as my patch for that architecture was already picked up by Catalin.
>
> I've found the patch [1] I mentioned, and it was for ARM.
Ah, well, I wish knew I knew ahead of time that someone was doing my
work for me... My initial submission seemed to have been missed[1].
> AFAIK, For ARM you'd need to put it into Russel's patch tracking system [2].
Ah, I did not know this.
Logan
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
