On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 05:35:32PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2019-03-20 09:15:00 [-0700], Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > I am considering making it a module_param() to avoid namespace pollution,
> > as it would become something like rcutree.nosoftirq.
> > 
> > Thoughts?
> 
> nope, perfect.

Please see below for an untested patch.  Thoughts?

                                                        Thanx, Paul

------------------------------------------------------------------------

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt 
b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
index d377a2166b79..767cdea30a1c 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
@@ -3672,6 +3672,10 @@
                        the propagation of recent CPU-hotplug changes up
                        the rcu_node combining tree.
 
+       rcutree.nosoftirq=      [KNL]
+                       If set, move all RCU_SOFTIRQ processing to per-CPU
+                       rcuc kthreads.  Defaults to using RCU_SOFTIRQ.
+
        rcutree.rcu_fanout_exact= [KNL]
                        Disable autobalancing of the rcu_node combining
                        tree.  This is used by rcutorture, and might
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 961dbc7b8949..e4baba8800f3 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -98,6 +98,9 @@ struct rcu_state rcu_state = {
 /* Dump rcu_node combining tree at boot to verify correct setup. */
 static bool dump_tree;
 module_param(dump_tree, bool, 0444);
+/* Move RCU_SOFTIRQ to rcuc kthreads. */
+static bool nosoftirq;
+module_param(nosoftirq, bool, 0444);
 /* Control rcu_node-tree auto-balancing at boot time. */
 static bool rcu_fanout_exact;
 module_param(rcu_fanout_exact, bool, 0444);
@@ -2330,15 +2333,6 @@ static void rcu_wake_cond(struct task_struct *t, int 
status)
                wake_up_process(t);
 }
 
-static bool rcu_softirq_enabled = true;
-
-static int __init rcunosoftirq_setup(char *str)
-{
-       rcu_softirq_enabled = false;
-       return 0;
-}
-__setup("rcunosoftirq", rcunosoftirq_setup);
-
 /*
  * Wake up this CPU's rcuc kthread to do RCU core processing.
  */
@@ -2349,7 +2343,7 @@ static void invoke_rcu_core(void)
 
        if (!cpu_online(smp_processor_id()))
                return;
-       if (rcu_softirq_enabled) {
+       if (!nosoftirq) {
                raise_softirq(RCU_SOFTIRQ);
        } else {
                local_irq_save(flags);
@@ -2424,7 +2418,7 @@ static int __init rcu_spawn_core_kthreads(void)
 
        for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
                per_cpu(rcu_data.rcu_cpu_has_work, cpu) = 0;
-       if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_BOOST) && rcu_softirq_enabled)
+       if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_BOOST) && !nosoftirq)
                return 0;
        WARN_ONCE(smpboot_register_percpu_thread(&rcu_cpu_thread_spec), "%s: 
Could not start rcub kthread, OOM is now expected behavior\n", __func__);
        return 0;
@@ -3467,7 +3461,7 @@ void __init rcu_init(void)
        rcu_init_one();
        if (dump_tree)
                rcu_dump_rcu_node_tree();
-       if (rcu_softirq_enabled)
+       if (!nosoftirq)
                open_softirq(RCU_SOFTIRQ, rcu_core_si);
 
        /*
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index eb99e750a930..c5a2acb2c7af 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -72,6 +72,8 @@ static void __init rcu_bootup_announce_oddness(void)
                pr_info("\tRCU debug GP init slowdown %d jiffies.\n", 
gp_init_delay);
        if (gp_cleanup_delay)
                pr_info("\tRCU debug GP init slowdown %d jiffies.\n", 
gp_cleanup_delay);
+       if (nosoftirq)
+               pr_info("\tRCU_SOFTIRQ processing moved to rcuc kthreads.\n");
        if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG))
                pr_info("\tRCU debug extended QS entry/exit.\n");
        rcupdate_announce_bootup_oddness();

Reply via email to