On 2019-03-20 10:30:01 [-0700], Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 05:35:32PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > On 2019-03-20 09:15:00 [-0700], Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > I am considering making it a module_param() to avoid namespace pollution, > > > as it would become something like rcutree.nosoftirq. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > nope, perfect. > > Please see below for an untested patch. Thoughts?
> - if (rcu_softirq_enabled) { > + if (!nosoftirq) { > raise_softirq(RCU_SOFTIRQ); > } else { This double negation looks weird. Can we flip the logic somehow? /me testing if it works… > Thanx, Paul Sebastian