On 2019-03-20 10:30:01 [-0700], Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 05:35:32PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > On 2019-03-20 09:15:00 [-0700], Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > I am considering making it a module_param() to avoid namespace pollution,
> > > as it would become something like rcutree.nosoftirq.
> > > 
> > > Thoughts?
> > 
> > nope, perfect.
> 
> Please see below for an untested patch.  Thoughts?

> -     if (rcu_softirq_enabled) {
> +     if (!nosoftirq) {
>               raise_softirq(RCU_SOFTIRQ);
>       } else {

This double negation looks weird. Can we flip the logic somehow?
/me testing if it works…
>                                                       Thanx, Paul

Sebastian

Reply via email to