>
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 02:12:30AM -0400, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> > > All this ad hoc IS_DAX conditional logic is getting pretty nasty.
> > >
> > > xfs_file_mmap(
> > > ....
> > > {
> > > struct inode *inode = file_inode(filp);
> > >
> > > if (vma->vm_flags & VM_SYNC) {
> > > if (!IS_DAX(inode))
> > > return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > if (!dax_synchronous(xfs_find_daxdev_for_inode(inode))
> > > return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > }
> > >
> > > file_accessed(filp);
> > > vma->vm_ops = &xfs_file_vm_ops;
> > > if (IS_DAX(inode))
> > > vma->vm_flags |= VM_HUGEPAGE;
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> >
> > Sure, this is better.
>
> > > Even better, factor out all the "MAP_SYNC supported" checks into a
> > > helper so that the filesystem code just doesn't have to care about
> > > the details of checking for DAX+MAP_SYNC support....
> >
> > o.k. Will add one common helper function for both ext4 & xfs filesystems.
>
> Note this pending patch for Goldwyn Rodrigues' patchset for btrfs:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20190328102418.5466-1-kilob...@angband.pl/
>
> We might want to coordinate.
Sure. Good to know.
Thanks for the pointer. Will have a look.
Best regards,
Pankaj
>
>
> Meow!
> --
> ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
> ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Did ya know that typing "test -j8" instead of "ctest -j8"
> ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ will make your testsuite pass much faster, and fix bugs?
> ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀
>
