On 2019/4/9 2:01, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 11:09:09PM +0800, Yue Haibing wrote:
>> From: YueHaibing <yuehaib...@huawei.com>
>>
>> Fix sparse warnings:
>>
>> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-artpec6.c:691:5: warning:
>> symbol 'artpec6_pmx_enable' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-artpec6.c:705:6: warning:
>> symbol 'artpec6_pmx_disable' was not declared. Should it be static?
>>
>> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaib...@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-artpec6.c | 10 ++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-artpec6.c
>> b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-artpec6.c
>> index d89dc43..e836850 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-artpec6.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-artpec6.c
>> @@ -688,8 +688,9 @@ static void artpec6_pmx_select_func(struct pinctrl_dev
>> *pctldev,
>> }
>> }
>>
>> -int artpec6_pmx_enable(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int function,
>> - unsigned int group)
>> +static int artpec6_pmx_enable(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
>> + unsigned int function,
>> + unsigned int group)
>> {
>> struct artpec6_pmx *pmx = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
>>
>> @@ -702,8 +703,9 @@ int artpec6_pmx_enable(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
>> unsigned int function,
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -void artpec6_pmx_disable(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int function,
>> - unsigned int group)
>> +static void artpec6_pmx_disable(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
>> + unsigned int function,
>> + unsigned int group)
>
> On arm32 allyesconfig:
>
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-artpec6.c:706:13: error: unused function
> 'artpec6_pmx_disable' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
>
> This is the second time you've introduced an unused function warning by
> making a function static[1], could you please be a little more vigilant
> in your clean ups in the future?
Sorry for this.
>
> [1]:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190327050126.12064-1-natechancel...@gmail.com/
>
> Linus/Jesper/Lars, should this function just be deleted? I'd be happy to
> send a patch doing so if that's the right course of action.
>
> Thanks,
> Nathan
>
>> {
>> struct artpec6_pmx *pmx = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
>>
>> --
>> 2.7.0
>>
>>
>
> .
>
