16.04.2019 4:52, Chanwoo Choi пишет:
> Hi,
> 
> On 19. 4. 15. 오후 11:54, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> The clk_set_min_rate() could fail and in this case clk_set_rate() sets
>> rate to 0, which may drop EMC rate to minimum and make machine very
>> difficult to use.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dig...@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/devfreq/tegra-devfreq.c | 10 ++++++++--
>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/tegra-devfreq.c 
>> b/drivers/devfreq/tegra-devfreq.c
>> index 0c0909fba545..69581c9082d4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/devfreq/tegra-devfreq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/tegra-devfreq.c
>> @@ -487,6 +487,7 @@ static int tegra_devfreq_target(struct device *dev, 
>> unsigned long *freq,
>>      struct tegra_devfreq *tegra = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>>      struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
>>      unsigned long rate;
>> +    int err;
>>  
>>      opp = devfreq_recommended_opp(dev, freq, flags);
>>      if (IS_ERR(opp)) {
>> @@ -496,8 +497,13 @@ static int tegra_devfreq_target(struct device *dev, 
>> unsigned long *freq,
>>      rate = dev_pm_opp_get_freq(opp);
>>      dev_pm_opp_put(opp);
>>  
>> -    clk_set_min_rate(tegra->emc_clock, rate);
>> -    clk_set_rate(tegra->emc_clock, 0);
>> +    err = clk_set_min_rate(tegra->emc_clock, rate);
>> +    if (err)
>> +            return err;
>> +
>> +    err = clk_set_rate(tegra->emc_clock, 0);
>> +    if (err)
> 
> Why don't you restore the previous minimum clock for tegra->emc_clock
> when failed to execute 'clk_set_rate(tegra->emc_clock, 0);'?
> 
> I think that if you control the restoring the previous minimum clock,
> it is more nice to handle the error handling.

I now see that devfreq has the previous_freq field and indeed it is possible to 
restore the min_rate value using it. Thanks for the suggestion.

Reply via email to