From: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>

The calculation of slots results in a value in the range 1..8
and so slots can never be zero.  The check for slots == 0 is
always going to be false, hence it is redundant and can be
removed.

Addresses-Coverity: ("Logically dead code")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c 
b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c
index ab9e2b901094..f70436261746 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c
@@ -2044,8 +2044,6 @@ static int sdhci_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
 
        slots = PCI_SLOT_INFO_SLOTS(slots) + 1;
        dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "found %d slot(s)\n", slots);
-       if (slots == 0)
-               return -ENODEV;
 
        BUG_ON(slots > MAX_SLOTS);
 
-- 
2.20.1

Reply via email to