On 31/05/19 2:32 PM, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
>
> The calculation of slots results in a value in the range 1..8
> and so slots can never be zero. The check for slots == 0 is
> always going to be false, hence it is redundant and can be
> removed.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Logically dead code")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hun...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c
> b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c
> index ab9e2b901094..f70436261746 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c
> @@ -2044,8 +2044,6 @@ static int sdhci_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>
> slots = PCI_SLOT_INFO_SLOTS(slots) + 1;
> dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "found %d slot(s)\n", slots);
> - if (slots == 0)
> - return -ENODEV;
>
> BUG_ON(slots > MAX_SLOTS);
>
>
