Hi Peter,

On 22/06/2019 06:25, Peter Rosin wrote:
On 2019-06-14 19:54, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
Add a wrapper to class_find_device() to search for a device
by the of_node pointer, reusing the generic match function.
Also convert the existing users to make use of the new helper.

Cc: Alan Tull <[email protected]>
Cc: Moritz Fischer <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Peter Rosin <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <[email protected]>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <[email protected]>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <[email protected]>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Peter Rosin <[email protected]>

Whoooa! I reviewed only the drivers/mux/core.c changes when this was done
in a series of much smaller patches. This tag makes it seem as if I have
reviewed the whole thing, which I had not done when you added this tag out
of the blue.

Apologies for the surprise. The patch was simply squashed with the change that
introduced the "helper" to better aid the reviewers, based on suggestions on the
list. I kept your tags, only because there were no changes, but some additional
context on the core driver.


Now, this stuff is trivial and by now I have looked at the other files
and it all seems simple enough. So, you can keep the tag, but it is NOT
ok to handle tags like you have done here.

Sure, I will keep that in mind.

Cheers
Suzuki

Reply via email to