On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 12:52:08PM -0700, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
> Sg_init_one() will already call sg_set_buf(), so another explicit call
> right after it is unnecessary. Drop it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smir...@gmail.com>
> Cc: Stefan Agner <ste...@agner.ch>
> Cc: Bhuvanchandra DV <bhuvanchandra...@toradex.com>
> Cc: Chris Healy <cphe...@gmail.com>
> Cc: Cory Tusar <cory.tu...@zii.aero>
> Cc: Lucas Stach <l.st...@pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jsl...@suse.com>
> Cc: linux-...@nxp.com
> Cc: linux-ser...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>  drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c b/drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c
> index 1b3f2a87e558..b600f591c8c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c
> @@ -1144,7 +1144,6 @@ static inline int lpuart_start_rx_dma(struct 
> lpuart_port *sport)
>               return -ENOMEM;
>  
>       sg_init_one(&sport->rx_sgl, ring->buf, sport->rx_dma_rng_buf_len);
> -     sg_set_buf(&sport->rx_sgl, ring->buf, sport->rx_dma_rng_buf_len);
>       nent = dma_map_sg(sport->port.dev, &sport->rx_sgl, 1, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>  
>       if (!nent) {

This patch doesn't apply, is it already in the tree from someone else?

thanks,

greg k-h

Reply via email to