On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 03:32:07PM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > Commit 71523d1812ac (pwm: Ensure pwm_apply_state() doesn't modify the > state argument) updated the kernel-doc for pwm_apply_state(), but not > for the ->apply callback in the pwm_ops struct. > > Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <[email protected]> > --- > include/linux/pwm.h | 5 +---- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/pwm.h b/include/linux/pwm.h > index b2c9c460947d..0ef808d925bb 100644 > --- a/include/linux/pwm.h > +++ b/include/linux/pwm.h > @@ -243,10 +243,7 @@ pwm_set_relative_duty_cycle(struct pwm_state *state, > unsigned int duty_cycle, > * @request: optional hook for requesting a PWM > * @free: optional hook for freeing a PWM > * @capture: capture and report PWM signal > - * @apply: atomically apply a new PWM config. The state argument > - * should be adjusted with the real hardware config (if the > - * approximate the period or duty_cycle value, state should > - * reflect it) > + * @apply: atomically apply a new PWM config
Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]> Thanks Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
