* Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It would always be nice. For this case I don't think it's very
> > interesting, if we pursue the improved sg iteration setup.
>
> BTW, I think it's pretty clear that ata_sg_is_last() is broken. It's
> likely a one-off in the n_iter test.
fixing that would be a -stable candidate, as a potential data corruptor
- or is it more benign?
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
