On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 1:14 PM Quentin Perret <qper...@google.com> wrote: > > Hey Viresh > > On Thursday 25 Jun 2020 at 16:24:16 (+0530), Viresh Kumar wrote: > > The locking around governors handling isn't adequate currently. The list > > of governors should never be traversed without locking in place. Also we > > must make sure the governor isn't removed while it is still referenced > > by code. > > Thanks for having a look at this! > > This solves the issue for the reference to policy->last_governor, but > given that your patch is based on top of > 20200623142138.209513-3-qper...@google.com, 'default_governor' needs a > similar treatment I think.
So I would prefer to rebase the $subject patch from Viresh on top of the current mainline, apply it first and rebase the "default governor" series on top of it - and include the changes needed for the default governor handling in there. Thanks!