On Thursday 25 Jun 2020 at 15:32:43 (+0200), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 1:14 PM Quentin Perret <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hey Viresh > > > > On Thursday 25 Jun 2020 at 16:24:16 (+0530), Viresh Kumar wrote: > > > The locking around governors handling isn't adequate currently. The list > > > of governors should never be traversed without locking in place. Also we > > > must make sure the governor isn't removed while it is still referenced > > > by code. > > > > Thanks for having a look at this! > > > > This solves the issue for the reference to policy->last_governor, but > > given that your patch is based on top of > > [email protected], 'default_governor' needs a > > similar treatment I think. > > So I would prefer to rebase the $subject patch from Viresh on top of > the current mainline, apply it first and rebase the "default governor" > series on top of it - and include the changes needed for the default > governor handling in there.
Right, and Viresh's patch might be -stable material too? In any case, making it standalone makes a lot of sense. Thanks, Quentin
