On Fri, 10 Jul 2020, at 05:27, Eddie James wrote:
> When calculating the clock divider, start dividing at 2 instead of 1.
> The divider is divided by two at the end of the calculation, so starting
> at 1 may result in a divider of 0, which shouldn't happen.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eddie James <eaja...@linux.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: Andrew Jeffery <and...@aj.id.au>

Reply via email to