On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 12:20:43AM -0700, ira.we...@intel.com wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> index f362ce0d5ac0..d69250a7c1bf 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
> #include <asm/spec-ctrl.h>
> #include <asm/io_bitmap.h>
> #include <asm/proto.h>
> +#include <asm/pkeys_internal.h>
>
> #include "process.h"
>
> @@ -184,6 +185,36 @@ int copy_thread_tls(unsigned long clone_flags, unsigned
> long sp,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * NOTE: We wrap pks_init_task() and pks_sched_in() with
> + * CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SUPERVISOR_PKEYS because using IS_ENABLED() fails
> + * due to the lack of task_struct->saved_pkrs in this configuration.
> + * Furthermore, we place them here because of the complexity introduced by
> + * header conflicts introduced to get the task_struct definition in the pkeys
> + * headers.
> + */
I don't see anything much useful in that comment.
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SUPERVISOR_PKEYS
> +DECLARE_PER_CPU(u32, pkrs_cache);
> +static inline void pks_init_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
> +{
> + /* New tasks get the most restrictive PKRS value */
> + tsk->thread.saved_pkrs = INIT_PKRS_VALUE;
> +}
> +static inline void pks_sched_in(void)
> +{
> + u64 current_pkrs = current->thread.saved_pkrs;
> +
> + /* Only update the MSR when current's pkrs is different from the MSR. */
> + if (this_cpu_read(pkrs_cache) == current_pkrs)
> + return;
> +
> + write_pkrs(current_pkrs);
Should we write that like:
/*
* PKRS is only temporarily changed during specific code paths.
* Only a preemption during these windows away from the default
* value would require updating the MSR.
*/
if (unlikely(this_cpu_read(pkrs_cache) != current_pkrs))
write_pkrs(current_pkrs);
?
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline void pks_init_task(struct task_struct *tsk) { }
> +static inline void pks_sched_in(void) { }
> +#endif
