On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 02:29:20PM +0100, Julien Thierry wrote: > > > On 7/30/20 2:22 PM, pet...@infradead.org wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 01:40:42PM +0100, Julien Thierry wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 7/30/20 10:57 AM, pet...@infradead.org wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:41:41AM +0100, Julien Thierry wrote: > > > > > + if (file->elf->changed) > > > > > + return elf_write(file->elf); > > > > > + else > > > > > + return 0; > > > > > } > > > > > > > > I think we can do without that else :-) > > > > > > > > > > I did wonder and was not 100% confident about it, but the orc gen will > > > always change the file, correct? > > > > Not if it already has orc, iirc. > > > > But what I was trying to say is that: > > > > if (file->elf->changed) > > return elf_write(file->elf) > > > > return 0; > > > > is identical code and, IMO, easier to read. > > > > Much easier yes, I'll change it.
But I think file->elf->changed can be assumed at this point anyway, so it could just be an unconditional return elf_write(file->elf); -- Josh