The way the comments in the *switch* statement in module_sig_check() are
indented, it may seem they refer to the statements above them, not below.
Align the comments with the *case* and *default* labels below them, fixing
the comment style and adding article/dash, while at it...

Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtyl...@omprussia.ru>

---
 kernel/module.c |   17 +++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Index: linux/kernel/module.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/module.c
+++ linux/kernel/module.c
@@ -2901,10 +2901,11 @@ static int module_sig_check(struct load_
                info->sig_ok = true;
                return 0;
 
-               /* We don't permit modules to be loaded into trusted kernels
-                * without a valid signature on them, but if we're not
-                * enforcing, certain errors are non-fatal.
-                */
+       /*
+        * We don't permit modules to be loaded into the trusted kernels
+        * without a valid signature on them, but if we're not enforcing,
+        * certain errors are non-fatal.
+        */
        case -ENODATA:
                reason = "no signature";
                goto decide;
@@ -2922,10 +2923,10 @@ static int module_sig_check(struct load_
 
                return security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_MODULE_SIGNATURE);
 
-               /* All other errors are fatal, including nomem, unparseable
-                * signatures and signature check failures - even if signatures
-                * aren't required.
-                */
+       /*
+        * All other errors are fatal, including nomem, unparseable signatures
+        * and signature check failures -- even if signatures aren't required.
+        */
        default:
                return err;
        }


Reply via email to