On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 12:22:49PM +0000, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 11:40:29AM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 04:29:02PM +0000, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> > > Use an int to calculate scale values inside scmi_hwmon_scale() to match
> > > the updated scale data type in struct scmi_sensor_info.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.maru...@arm.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/hwmon/scmi-hwmon.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/scmi-hwmon.c b/drivers/hwmon/scmi-hwmon.c
> > > index 09ce30cba54b..17d064e58938 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/hwmon/scmi-hwmon.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/scmi-hwmon.c
> > > @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ static inline u64 __pow10(u8 x)
> > >
> > > static int scmi_hwmon_scale(const struct scmi_sensor_info *sensor, u64
> > > *value)
> > > {
> > > - s8 scale = sensor->scale;
> > > + int scale = sensor->scale;
> >
> > Can this go independent of the series ? You haven't cc-ed the hwmon
> > maintainer
> > and the list. We need their ack if we have to take it as part of the series.
> >
> Sure, I did not know in fact what's better to in this case (maybe
> bouncing/fwd the single patch ? CC the whole series ? ).
> I'll split and send to the maintainer
I see this can be independent of the series. I can provide my review/ack
tag once the maintainer is in cc. No point giving that here 😄
--
Regards,
Sudeep
