On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 03:00:40PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2020-12-07 12:47:43 [+0100], Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 06:02:00PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > @@ -825,7 +848,20 @@ void tasklet_kill(struct tasklet_struct
> > >
> > > while (test_and_set_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state)) {
> > > do {
> > > - yield();
> > > } while (test_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state));
> > > }
> > > tasklet_unlock_wait(t);
> >
> >
> > Egads... should we not start by doing something like this?
>
> So we keep the RT part as-is and replace the non-RT bits with this?
For RT you probably want to wrap the wait_var_event() in that
local_bh_disable()/enable() pear. I just figured those unbounded
spin/yield loops suck and we should get rid of em.
