On Mon, Dec 07 2020 at 15:00, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2020-12-07 12:47:43 [+0100], Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 06:02:00PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> > @@ -825,7 +848,20 @@ void tasklet_kill(struct tasklet_struct
>> >
>> > while (test_and_set_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state)) {
>> > do {
>> > - yield();
>> > } while (test_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state));
>> > }
>> > tasklet_unlock_wait(t);
>>
>>
>> Egads... should we not start by doing something like this?
>
> So we keep the RT part as-is and replace the non-RT bits with this?
No. It would work for both.
