On 15-12-20, 11:04, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Every time I have stumbled upon this routine, I get confused with the > way 'have_policy' is used and I have to dig in to understand why is it > so. Here is an attempt to make it easier to understand, and hopefully it > is an improvement. > > The 'have_policy' check was just an optimization to avoid writing > to amu_fie_cpus in case we don't have to, but that optimization itself > is creating more confusion than the real work. Lets just do that if all > the CPUs support AMUs. It is much cleaner that way. > > Reviewed-by: Ionela Voinescu <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> > --- > V3: > - Added Reviewed by tag.
Catalin, please pick the first two patches for 5.11. I will send the last one separately later on. -- viresh
