Hi Viresh, On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 01:27:32PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 15-12-20, 11:04, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > Every time I have stumbled upon this routine, I get confused with the > > way 'have_policy' is used and I have to dig in to understand why is it > > so. Here is an attempt to make it easier to understand, and hopefully it > > is an improvement. > > > > The 'have_policy' check was just an optimization to avoid writing > > to amu_fie_cpus in case we don't have to, but that optimization itself > > is creating more confusion than the real work. Lets just do that if all > > the CPUs support AMUs. It is much cleaner that way. > > > > Reviewed-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voine...@arm.com> > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> > > --- > > V3: > > - Added Reviewed by tag. > > Catalin, please pick the first two patches for 5.11. I will send the > last one separately later on.
I haven't figured out whether these are fixes (a cover letter would help ;)). They look like generic improvements to me and given that we are already in the 5.11 merging window, they would probably need to wait until 5.12. -- Catalin