On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 07:21:13AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 10:52:53PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > (... i486 ...) > > As with the other older platforms, the main question to ask is: > > Are there users that are better off running a future LTS kernel on this > > hardware than the v5.10.y version or something older? > > I think this is the most important part of the question. Because the > possible use case I've described actually doesn't correspond to a > "prod" machine but to a machine that's powered on every 5 years for > some old data recovery. In such a case users just start with an old > system (possibly the one that's still on them if present), and this > doesn't warrant an up-to-date OS. > > Moreover, just as I experienced when maintaining 2.4, there's a point > where support for old stuff starts to break again by lack of testing. > And just because of this, users shouldn't always expect to see their > old machines boot fine on a recent kernel. Sometimes there may even be > difficulties setting up a compatible toolchain. > > So actually the question shouldn't be "does anyone want such old > machines to still be supported" but "does anyone *need* them to be > supported". And I suspect that for most of them the response is "no", > it's just a convenience.
What about feature obsolescence? Consider that old ssh (supporting only the v1 protocol) will no longer connect to new sshd (supporting only the v2 protocol) or older NFS supporting UDP only trying to connect to new NFS supporting only TCP. Or older NFS that does buggily support TCP and won't talk to newer machines. At one time, the suggestion would've been to use a DOS formatted floppy to transfer the data... but modern machines tend not to have floppy drives. USB pendrive? Maybe the older machine doesn't have USB. I suppose you'd have to resort to FTP at that point to move data off the old machine, or via email if you have email setup on it. Having a machine that's able to boot an old installation just means it can run, but it doesn't guarantee that it will be useful once booted to move old data onto newer machines. Over Christmas, I booted my Acorn A5000 (the very first machine to run Linux on ARM) to retrieve some old data off it - thankfully I still have an Acorn Ether1 card with an AUI interface and a 10baseT MAU to connect to my network. Sadly, support for running Linux on it has long since passed - with only 8MB and 32KiB pages, modern Linux would struggle with it, which is really the reason why support was dropped. Linux outgrew the hardware. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!