On Sat 2007-12-22 12:09:59, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:06:24 +0000
> Matthew Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi - I'm trying to come up with a way of thoroughly testing every byte
> > of RAM from within Linux on amd64 (so that it can be automated better
> > than using memtest86+), and came up with an idea which I'm not sure is
> > supported or practical.
> >
> > The obvious problem with testing memory from user space is that you
> > can't mlock all of it, so the best you can do is about three quarters,
> > and hope that the rest of the memory is okay.
>
> well... to be honest the more obvious problem will be that you won't be
> testing the RAM, you'll be testing the CPU's cache.. over and over again.
>
> memtest86+ does various magic to basically bypass the caches (by disabling
> them ;-)...
> Doing that in a live kernel situation, and from userspace to boot......
> that's... and issue.
Are you sure? I always assumed that memtest just used patterns bigger
than L1/L2 caches... ... and IIRC my celeron testing confirmed it, if
I disabled L2 cache in BIOS, memtest behave differently.
Anyway, if you can do iopl(), we may as well let you disable caches,
but you are right, that will need a kernel patch.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
