On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 03:57:58PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:52:22PM +0100, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
> > Hello Peter,
> >
> > On 28/01/2021 12:33, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > This, from commit 6b07d38aaa52 ("MIPS: Octeon: Use optimized memory
> > > barrier primitives."):
> > >
> > > #define smp_mb__before_llsc() smp_wmb()
> > > #define __smp_mb__before_llsc() __smp_wmb()
> > >
> > > is also dodgy as hell and really wants a comment too. I'm not buying the
> > > Changelog of that commit either, __smp_mb__before_llsc should also
> > > ensure the LL cannot happen earlier, but SYNCW has no effect on loads.
> > > So what stops the load from being speculated?
> >
> > hmm, the commit message you point to above, says:
> >
> > "Since Octeon does not do speculative reads, this functions as a full
> > barrier."
>
> So then the only difference between SYNC and SYNCW is a pipeline drain?
>
> I still worry about the transitivity thing.. ISTR that being a sticky
> point back then too.
Ah, there we are, it's called multi-copy-atomic these days:
f1ab25a30ce8 ("memory-barriers: Replace uses of "transitive"")
Do those SYNCW / write-completion barriers guarantee this?
