> > The code is looks fine, but Jack Yu added a separate patch that makes
> > RTL1019 equivalent to RTL1015, so should this patch also handle the
> > RTL1019 case?
> 
> The topology used by this machine driver is using 48k, 64fs I2S format.
> RT1019 needs to support this configuration. Not sure if RT1019 could support
> that.
> 

Yes, RT1019 supports 48k, 64fs I2S format.

Reply via email to