On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 12:05:56PM -0500, Simon Kirby wrote: > Hmm... Just wondering: what does TCP then do when it receives this ECN > notification? Try harder, try less? Or does it get a specific packet It will act in the same way if it the packet was dropped (but the packet wasn't dropped). That is quite obviously correct behaviour. The RFC also mentions that different congestion control treatment would be unfair with the non-ECN capable TCP connections (but obviously non-ECN TCP connections are just penalized with the current algorithm so such argument doesn't make much sense to me, said that the standard congestion control looks sane choice and it also avoids a mess in the TCP code internals). Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Matti Aarnio
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN David S. Miller
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN James Sutherland
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Lars Marowsky-Bree
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN James Sutherland
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Lars Marowsky-Bree
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jamie Lokier
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN David S. Miller
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jamie Lokier
- ECN Simon Kirby
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jamie Lokier
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN H. Peter Anvin
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Marian Jancar
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN H. Peter Anvin
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Dax Kelson
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jamie Lokier
- Re: ECN -? Anything _I_ need to do to... List User
- Re: ECN -? Anything _I_ need to do to... Matti Aarnio
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN David S. Miller
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN James Sutherland