Jamie Lokier writes: > Does ECN provide perceived benefits to the node using it? Yes, endpoints and intermediate routers can tell the TCP sender about congestion instead of TCP having to guess about it based upon observed packet drop. It is a major enhancement to performance over any WAN. The endpoint based congestion notification happens _now_ if both sides speak ECN. The router based notification will be happening in the near future as Cisco and others deploy ECN speaking versions of their router software. Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Florian Weimer
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Rogier Wolff
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Alan Cox
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Matti Aarnio
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN David S. Miller
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN James Sutherland
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Lars Marowsky-Bree
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN James Sutherland
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Lars Marowsky-Bree
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jamie Lokier
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN David S. Miller
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jamie Lokier
- ECN Simon Kirby
- Re: ECN Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jamie Lokier
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN H. Peter Anvin
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Marian Jancar
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN H. Peter Anvin
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Dax Kelson
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jamie Lokier
- Re: ECN -? Anything _I_ need to do to... List User