On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 02:12:33PM +0200, Miroslav Benes wrote: > On Wed, 22 Apr 2026 21:03:38 -0700, Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]> > wrote: > > find_symbol_by_name() only returns the first match, so > > --debug-checksum=<func> silently ignores any subsequent duplicately > > named functions after the first. > > > > Add a new iterate_sym_by_name() to fix that. > > The patch is ok but is it worth it when you remove it again in 39/48 > with a better implementation? Can 39/48 be moved here in the series > instead?
Indeed... -- Josh
