On Tue, Sep 08, 2026 at 11:56:41PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Tue, 2026-09-08 at 15:53 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > Thank you very much!!! > > > > I am interpreting this to mean that Kunwu's current approach does what > > you need, so that we can keep current get_state_synchronize_srcu() > > and poll_state_synchronize_srcu() semantics. > > Yes, thank you. I'll rebase the KVM parts on top when it lands.
Queued for testing and further review, thank you both!
Thanx, Paul
