Alan Cox wrote: > > > How close is TCP_NOPUSH to behaving identically to TCP_CORK now? > > If it does behave identically, it might be time to standardize > > the symbolic name for this option, to make apps more portable > > between the two OS's. (It'd be nice to also standardize the > > numeric value, in the interest of making the ABI's more compatible, too.) > > That one isnt practical because of the way the implementations handle > boolean options. BSD uses bitmask based option setting for the basic > options and Linus uses switch statements OK, well, at least a common symbolic name could be chosen. - Dan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
