Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> How close is TCP_NOPUSH to behaving identically to TCP_CORK now? >> If it does behave identically, it might be time to standardize >> the symbolic name for this option, to make apps more portable >> between the two OS's. (It'd be nice to also standardize the >> numeric value, in the interest of making the ABI's more compatible, too.) > >That one isnt practical because of the way the implementations handle >boolean options. BSD uses bitmask based option setting for the basic >options and Linus uses switch statements No, that's only true for some of the socket-level options. For the TCP options there isn't a direct correspondance between the option number and the number of the flag in the PCB. Tony. -- f.a.n.finch [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Dead! And yet there he stands!" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/