On Thu,  1 Nov 2012 16:07:27 +0400
Glauber Costa <glom...@parallels.com> wrote:

> Because the ultimate goal of the kmem tracking in memcg is to track slab
> pages as well, we can't guarantee that we'll always be able to point a
> page to a particular process, and migrate the charges along with it -
> since in the common case, a page will contain data belonging to multiple
> processes.
> 
> Because of that, when we destroy a memcg, we only make sure the
> destruction will succeed by discounting the kmem charges from the user
> charges when we try to empty the cgroup.

There was a significant conflict with the sched/numa changes in
linux-next, which I resolved as below.  Please check it.

static int mem_cgroup_reparent_charges(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
{
        struct cgroup *cgrp = memcg->css.cgroup;
        int node, zid;
        u64 usage;

        do {
                if (cgroup_task_count(cgrp) || !list_empty(&cgrp->children))
                        return -EBUSY;
                /* This is for making all *used* pages to be on LRU. */
                lru_add_drain_all();
                drain_all_stock_sync(memcg);
                mem_cgroup_start_move(memcg);
                for_each_node_state(node, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
                        for (zid = 0; zid < MAX_NR_ZONES; zid++) {
                                enum lru_list lru;
                                for_each_lru(lru) {
                                        mem_cgroup_force_empty_list(memcg,
                                                        node, zid, lru);
                                }
                        }
                }
                mem_cgroup_end_move(memcg);
                memcg_oom_recover(memcg);
                cond_resched();

                /*
                 * Kernel memory may not necessarily be trackable to a specific
                 * process. So they are not migrated, and therefore we can't
                 * expect their value to drop to 0 here.
                 * Having res filled up with kmem only is enough.
                 *
                 * This is a safety check because mem_cgroup_force_empty_list
                 * could have raced with mem_cgroup_replace_page_cache callers
                 * so the lru seemed empty but the page could have been added
                 * right after the check. RES_USAGE should be safe as we always
                 * charge before adding to the LRU.
                 */
                usage = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->res, RES_USAGE) -
                        res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->kmem, RES_USAGE);
        } while (usage > 0);

        return 0;
}

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to