On 11/02/2012 04:04 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 16:07:16 +0400 > Glauber Costa <glom...@parallels.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> This work introduces the kernel memory controller for memcg. Unlike previous >> submissions, this includes the whole controller, comprised of slab and stack >> memory. > > I'm in the middle of (re)reading all this. Meanwhile I'll push it all > out to http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/ for the crazier testers. > > One thing: > >> Numbers can be found at https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/13/239 > > You claim in the above that the fork worload is 'slab intensive". Or > at least, you seem to - it's a bit fuzzy. > > But how slab intensive is it, really? > > What is extremely slab intensive is networking. The networking guys > are very sensitive to slab performance. If this hasn't already been > done, could you please determine what impact this has upon networking? > I expect Eric Dumazet, Dave Miller and Tom Herbert could suggest > testing approaches. >
I can test it, but unfortunately I am unlikely to get to prepare a good environment before Barcelona. I know, however, that Greg Thelen was testing netperf in his setup. Greg, do you have any publishable numbers you could share? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
