From: David Woodhouse <dw...@infradead.org> Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 12:52:14 +0000
> Now that we can return zero from pppoatm_send() for reasons *other* than > the queue being full, that means we can't depend on a subsequent call to > pppoatm_pop() waking the queue, and we might leave it stalled > indefinitely. > > Fix this by immediately scheduling the wakeup tasklet. As documented > already elsewhere, the PPP channel's ->downl lock protects against the > wakeup happening too soon and effectively being missed. > > Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <david.woodho...@intel.com> > ---- > Untested. > With this sorted, Acked-By: David Woodhouse <david.woodho...@intel.com< > to the other seven. Thanks. I don't know what to do with this patch because I don't have any context whatsoever. So I'm tossing it, please resubmit it when it's meant to be applied, and with some context. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
