From: Paolo Valente <paolo.vale...@unimore.it> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 10:45:14 +0100
> Got it. Actually, if the first qfq_peek_skb returns NULL, then the > example version that you are proposing apparently may behave in a > different way than the original one: in your proposal the scheduler > tries to switch to a new aggregate and may return a non-NULL value, > whereas the original version would immediately return NULL. I guess > that this slightly different behavior is fine as well, and I am > preparing a new patch that integrates these changes. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
