----- Original Message -----
> From: "Borislav Petkov" <[email protected]>
> To: "Steven Rostedt" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Tom St Denis" <[email protected]>, "David Dillow" 
> <[email protected]>, [email protected],
> [email protected]
> Sent: Sunday, 20 January, 2013 7:34:41 PM
> Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
> 
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 05:54:07PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > My God, you sound like a 2 year old.
> > 
> > Suck it up, and do the fixes. It's not the time you are worried
> > about,
> > as you most definitely spent more time bitching to everyone than it
> > would have taken you to clean up your work.
> 
> It's like you're reading my mind... :-)

The problem is for me to add the ()'s is a no brainer.

For me to re-write complete statements for coding style reasons means I have to 
actually go out and test it again.  In a proper IPsec lab that can take a 
couple of hours to make sure it's been run through its paces.  That's [among 
other things] the problem I have.  Re-writing perfectly good code because it 
doesn't meet coding "standards" that nobody else seems to match.

If you guys can't appreciate that I should just bow out of the discussion.  I 
didn't come here looking for a fight I came here to seek reason.

Tom
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to