On Sun, 2013-01-20 at 19:40 -0500, Tom St Denis wrote: > The problem is for me to add the ()'s is a no brainer.
It was more than just the ()'s. You completely botched the indentation in the parts of code you didn't copy from xcbc.c, among other issues. > For me to re-write complete statements for coding style reasons means > I have to actually go out and test it again. Well, for some of the code you submitted, that would be the first testing it got, even compile testing AFAICT. I don't doubt that you tested against your hardware, but it is obvious that you didn't run the algorithm tests you added, or even tried to compile them. You were missing a semicolon after your test data, and you were also missing a "\x" in there, so your test data was wrong. I know this, because I just spent the five minutes required to fix up the checkpatch warnings to prove to myself that you could have done it faster than sending one considered message to the list about how much we suck. Of course, that assumes you are trying to have a discussion instead of trolling; it's much easier to spew bile than to think before you post. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/