On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 6:04 AM, Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortma...@windriver.com> wrote: > Recent activity has had a focus on moving functionally related blocks of stuff > out of sched/core.c into stand-alone files. The code relating to load average > calculations has grown significantly enough recently to warrant placing it in > a separate file. > > Here we do that, and in doing so, we shed ~20k of code from sched/core.c > (~10%). > > A couple small static functions in the core sched.h header were also localized > to their singular user in sched/fair.c at the same time, with the goal to also > reduce the amount of "broadcast" content in that sched.h file. > > Paul. > --- > > [ Patches sent here are tested on tip's sched/core, i.e. v3.9-rc1-38-gb329fd5 > > Assuming that this change is OK with folks, the timing can be whatever is > most > convenient -- i.e. I can update/respin it close to the end of the merge > window > for what will be v3.10-rc1, if that is what minimizes the inconvenience to > folks > who might be changing the code that is relocated here. ] > > Paul Gortmaker (2): > sched: fork load calculation code from sched/core --> sched/load_avg > sched: move update_load_[add/sub/set] from sched.h to fair.c > > kernel/sched/Makefile | 2 +- > kernel/sched/core.c | 569 ----------------------------------------------- > kernel/sched/fair.c | 18 ++ > kernel/sched/load_avg.c | 577 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > kernel/sched/sched.h | 26 +-- > 5 files changed, 604 insertions(+), 588 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 kernel/sched/load_avg.c >
Is there any impact positive over vmlinuz size after these changes? Thanks, Rakib -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
