On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 12:30 AM, Rakib Mullick <rakib.mull...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 6:04 AM, Paul Gortmaker > <paul.gortma...@windriver.com> wrote: >> Recent activity has had a focus on moving functionally related blocks of >> stuff >> out of sched/core.c into stand-alone files. The code relating to load >> average >> calculations has grown significantly enough recently to warrant placing it in >> a separate file. >> >> Here we do that, and in doing so, we shed ~20k of code from sched/core.c >> (~10%).
[...] >> Paul Gortmaker (2): >> sched: fork load calculation code from sched/core --> sched/load_avg >> sched: move update_load_[add/sub/set] from sched.h to fair.c >> >> kernel/sched/Makefile | 2 +- >> kernel/sched/core.c | 569 >> ----------------------------------------------- >> kernel/sched/fair.c | 18 ++ >> kernel/sched/load_avg.c | 577 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> kernel/sched/sched.h | 26 +-- >> 5 files changed, 604 insertions(+), 588 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 kernel/sched/load_avg.c >> > > Is there any impact positive over vmlinuz size after these changes? As per the above description and diffstat, it is just a straight up code relocation, so aside from trivial differences in what the optimizer does, I'd expect no real change at all in the size or anything else Paul. -- > > Thanks, > Rakib > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
