On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 05/10, Lucas De Marchi wrote: >> >> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> wrote: >> > Well, personally I think it would be better to use kasprintf(), see the >> > patch I sent (it is actually wrong, needs kfree(args) before return). >> > >> > Or. How about the patch below? It should be split into 2 changes: >> > >> > 1. Introduce __argv_split(). It can have more callers, for >> > example do_coredump() and ftrace_function_filter_re() >> > can use it to avoid kstrndup() + kfree(). >> > >> > 2. Change call_modprobe() to use kasprintf() + __argv_split(). >> >> Seems better. In your previous version I was troubled about >> duplicating the string twice. > > Oh, compared to other things we need to do this is nothing ;) > > But to me it just looks better this way. > >> Now it's weird freeing a >> user-allocated-string, > > This is fine, the "weird" thing is that it frees the string even if > fails. But this simplifies the usage. > >> but I think it's a good tradeoff and covers other use cases as you >> pointed out as well. > > OK, good. > >> Ok. I'll give it a try. > > Please wait a bit, I'll send v2. See below. > >> > -char modprobe_path[KMOD_PATH_LEN] = "/sbin/modprobe"; >> > +char modprobe_path[KMOD_PATH_LEN] = "/sbin/modprobe -q --"; > > No. This is incompatible change, we shouldn't do this.
But then what option do we have? I don't think any distro writing to sysctl would stop working without "-q --". And if they are indeed using this during boot, I think they would be much safer to just change to set this at compile time like this patch is trying to do. Otherwise, the options are really ugly: 1) always give "-q --" by putting this on the kasprintf() call: kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s -q -- %s", modprobe_command, module_name). 2) provide a proc_dostring_modprobe, which ensures "-q --" is appended to the provided path (2) is ugly as (1), but would apply just to not break current setups and if set in Kconfig it's "-q --"-free. > >> > + args = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s %s", modprobe_path, module_name); > > This should be kasprintf("%s -q -- %s"). > > And it needs a comment to explain that we are safe even if we race > with proc_dostring(). ok Lucas De Marchi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/