Julia Lawall <julia.law...@lip6.fr> writes: > On Thu, 13 Jun 2013, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 02:07:40PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote: >> > I think using PTR_ERR() is a less bad solution than promoting PTR_RET, >> > which has a non-obvious name. >> >> Will a longer name make the function more obvious? >> PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO() ? >> PTR_ERR0() ? >> PTR_ERR() can then stay simple for cases where we know we >> are on the error path. > > I was thinking of something along those lines. And in that case, PTR_ERR > could stay without the additional test. > julia
OK, sold :) Will send out a series now with PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO. Thanks, Rusty. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
