On Wed, 17 Jul 2013, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 07/12/13 05:10, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > On 07/12, Javi Merino wrote: > >> I agree, we should drop the check. It's annoying in uniprocessors and > >> unlikely to be found in the real world unless your gic entry in the dt > >> is wrong.
And that's a likely outcome in the real world. > >> > > Ok. How about this? > > Any comments? What about this instead: diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c index 19ceaa60e0..86d21bc6cb 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ static u8 gic_get_cpumask(struct gic_chip_data *gic) break; } - if (!mask) + if (is_smp() && !mask) pr_crit("GIC CPU mask not found - kernel will fail to boot.\n"); return mask; Nicolas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/