* Gleb Natapov <g...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 11:25:39AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > Ingo,
> > >
> > > Do you have any concerns reg this series? please let me know if this
> > > looks good now to you.
> >
> > I'm inclined to NAK it for excessive quotation - who knows how many
> > people left the discussion in disgust? Was it done to drive away as
> > many reviewers as possible?
> >
> > Anyway, see my other reply, the measurement results seem hard to
> > interpret and inconclusive at the moment.
>
> That result was only for patch 18 of the series, not pvspinlock in
> general.
Okay - I've re-read the performance numbers and they are impressive, so no
objections from me.
The x86 impact seems to be a straightforward API change, with most of the
changes on the virtualization side. So:
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
I guess you'd want to carry this in the KVM tree or so - maybe in a
separate branch because it changes Xen as well?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
