* Gleb Natapov <g...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 11:46:03AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
> >
> > I guess you'd want to carry this in the KVM tree or so - maybe in a
> > separate branch because it changes Xen as well?
>
> It changes KVM host and guest side, XEN and common x86 spinlock code. I
> think it would be best to merge common x86 spinlock bits and guest side
> KVM/XEN bits through tip tree and host KVM part will go through KVM
> tree. If this is OK with you, Ingo, and XEN folks Raghavendra can send
> two separate patch series one for the tip and one for KVM host side.
Sure, that's fine - if the initial series works fine in isolation as well
(i.e. won't break anything).
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
