* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@ghostprotocols.net> wrote:
> Em Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 12:18:01PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra escreveu:
> > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 12:02:12PM +0200, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
> > > Perhaps this is even more clear than v2:
>
> > > len = snprintf(file, size, "%s", symbol_conf.symfs);
> > > size -= len;
> > > file += len;
> > > len = snprintf(file, MIN(size,(last_slash - dso->long_name) + 2),
> > > "%s", dso->long_name);
> > > size -= len;
> > > file += len;
> > > len = snprintf(file, size, ".debug%s", last_slash);
>
> > len = 0;
>
> > len += snprintf(str + len, size - len, ...);
> > len += snprintf(str + len, size - len, ...);
>
> And avoid snprintf like the plague, use scnprintf instead... See
> e7f01d1e3d8d501deb8abeaa269d5d48a703b8b0 for details :-)
Hm, could we do:
#define snprintf scnprintf
or:
#define snprintf(x...) BUILD_BUG()
?
I don't think there's any valid code, except printf wrappers (which we
don't have in perf), where the semantics of snprintf() would be needed.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
