Em Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 03:29:03PM +0200, Ingo Molnar escreveu: > * Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@ghostprotocols.net> wrote: > > Em Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 12:18:01PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra escreveu: > > > len += snprintf(str + len, size - len, ...); > > > len += snprintf(str + len, size - len, ...);
> > And avoid snprintf like the plague, use scnprintf instead... See > > e7f01d1e3d8d501deb8abeaa269d5d48a703b8b0 for details :-) > Hm, could we do: > #define snprintf scnprintf > or: > #define snprintf(x...) BUILD_BUG() > ? Yes, I prefer the later, with a short explanation, will do. - Arnaldo > I don't think there's any valid code, except printf wrappers (which we > don't have in perf), where the semantics of snprintf() would be needed. > > Thanks, > > Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
