The ip6_tunnel.c module would be then dependent on ip_tunnel.c and may
be it would not be good thing?
As I have check in v3.10 there is no call from ip6_tunnel to ip_tunnel...

For information, there is no check for the maximum MTU for ipv4 in the
patch as this is not done for ipv6.

Regards,
Oussama

On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
<han...@stressinduktion.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 03:51:48PM +0100, Oussama Ghorbel wrote:
>> The (inner) MTU of a ipip6 (IPv4-in-IPv6) tunnel cannot be set below 1280, 
>> which is the minimum MTU in IPv6.
>> However, there should be no IPv6 on the tunnel interface at all, so the IPv6 
>> rules should not apply.
>> More info at https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15530
>>
>> This patch allows to check the minimum MTU for ipv6 tunnel according to 
>> these rules:
>>  -In case the tunnel is configured with ipip6 mode the minimum MTU is 68.
>>  -In case the tunnel is configured with ip6ip6 or any mode the minimum MTU 
>> is 1280.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Oussama Ghorbel <oghorb...@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c |   10 ++++++++--
>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c
>> index 1e55866..a66ead2 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c
>> @@ -1423,8 +1423,14 @@ ip6_tnl_ioctl(struct net_device *dev, struct ifreq 
>> *ifr, int cmd)
>>  static int
>>  ip6_tnl_change_mtu(struct net_device *dev, int new_mtu)
>>  {
>> -     if (new_mtu < IPV6_MIN_MTU) {
>> -             return -EINVAL;
>> +     struct ip6_tnl *t = netdev_priv(dev);
>> +
>> +     if (t->parms.proto == IPPROTO_IPIP) {
>> +             if (new_mtu < 68)
>> +                     return -EINVAL;
>
> Maybe you could have a look at ip_tunnel_change_mtu in ipv4/ip_tunnel.c,
> generalize this check as e.g. ip_tunnel_valid_mtu or something and use it
> here? Maybe an af-independent ip_tunnel_max_mtu()?
>
>> +     } else {
>> +             if (new_mtu < IPV6_MIN_MTU)
>> +                     return -EINVAL;
>
> This check could also be used here, then.
>
>>       }
>>       dev->mtu = new_mtu;
>>       return 0;
>
> Thanks,
>
>   Hannes
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to